<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Well that&#x27;s fucking stupid when we know deplatforming works.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Well that’s fucking stupid when we know deplatforming works. Also you’re using specific definitions to deliberately misunderstand the paradox of tolerance so this is a stupid argument in the first place. If you allow those that break the social contract to remain in society, they will cause society to break down as that is their express and explicit goal. A fucking high school intellect wrote that garbage article. Also, fuck pacifism, that’s a tool of fascists.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Yeah we’re well past that point and have been definitely since alternative facts got normalized in discourse. This is a post-truth society. And next time use your own words instead of a gpt.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.unfinishedprojects.net/topic/d71274ea-9dd5-41ef-93fa-bde68f104331/well-that-s-fucking-stupid-when-we-know-deplatforming-works.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:45:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.unfinishedprojects.net/topic/d71274ea-9dd5-41ef-93fa-bde68f104331.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:59:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Well that&#x27;s fucking stupid when we know deplatforming works. on Sun, 01 Mar 2026 22:02:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Well that’s fucking stupid when we know deplatforming works. Also you’re using specific definitions to deliberately misunderstand the paradox of tolerance so this is a stupid argument in the first place.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Your willful ignorance &amp; stubborn denial of Karl Popper’s directly quoted writing on the subject is not a valid argument.<br />
Multiple references cited prove you wrong &amp; you’ve cited nothing.<br />
Conventional definitions found here &amp; all over the place (from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance#Exact_formulations" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">wikipedia</a> &amp; to <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/toleration/#ConTolPar" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">SEP</a>) fit Karl Popper’s usage and prove you’re wrong.<br />
You’re just wrong.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">A fucking high school intellect wrote that garbage article. Also, fuck pacifism, that’s a tool of fascists.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">You should be troubled that highschooler can refute you: work on yourself.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">And next time use your own words instead of a gpt.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Cool speculative <em>ad hominem</em>: beep boop.<br />
Supposing an AI reasons better than you should also trouble you.<br />
Try <em>arguing better</em> with <em>logic</em> &amp; <em>evidence</em> next time, genius.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.unfinishedprojects.net/post/https://group.lt/comment/9400212</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.unfinishedprojects.net/post/https://group.lt/comment/9400212</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lmmarsano@group.lt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 22:02:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>